Putting the US debt into perspective
Paul van Eeden
April 27. 2006
Many people still don't think
the amount of debt the US government has amassed is anything
to worry about, most commonly because it is still inconsequential
relative to the US economy. As much as the nominal debt may have
grown, the growth in the US economy has ensured that servicing
and carrying the debt is not a problem. Stated another way, the
US debt as a percentage of US GDP (gross domestic product) has
not grown out of hand and therefore the nominal amount of debt
is nothing to worry about.
Let us examine that proposition for a minute. Below is a chart
of the annual US GDP, the US government debt, and the US government's
debt as a percentage of the US GDP.
The exploding debt during the
Second World War is obvious, but notice how long it took the
debt to GDP ratio to decline to pre-war levels. The level of
actual debt has never declined, except for an insignificant $1
billion decline in 1946 and an equally insignificant $2 billion
decline in 1949. The US debt has expanded every year since World
War II.
Another interesting fact is that from around 1945 to about 1985
the US economy was growing at a faster pace than the US debt.
This is evident from the decline in the debt to GDP ratio. Since
1985, however, the situation is exactly the opposite: the US
debt is growing much faster than the US GDP.
The debt to GDP ratio improved during the late 1990s and the
current rate of growth in the ratio is much less than it was
during the eighties. But that reversal of the ratio in the late
1990s was due to the influx of foreign capital into the US and
the subsequent stimulus this influx of capital had on the US
economy. As a result tax receipts by the US government rose dramatically
(all those capital gains during the tech bubble and stock market
boom). That's over and the debt to GDP ratio is once again on
the rise. Also, we have not seen the reversal of those international
capital flows -- something that has been discussed at length
in these pages -- and when that reversal occurs it will not only
cause the dollar to decline, but will also cause the US debt
to increase.
Regardless of what the Fed, the White House, the Senate or the
press want you to believe, if China and Japan stop supporting
the US dollar, US medium to long-term interest rates are going
to rise. That would put a drag on the already anemic US economy,
which means tax receipts by the US government will decline at
the same time as the interest charges on the US debt will rise.
The problem is that the US government is more likely to increase
its deficit spending than to cut it, in an attempt to add stimulus.
The current debt to GDP ratio is almost twice as high as the
debt to GDP ratio during the final stages of the Vietnam War
and compared to Vietnam the US' current military adventures are
skirmishes. If we combine increasing military spending with an
increase in domestic deficit spending, higher interest rates
and lower government tax receipts, then the debt to GDP ratio
could rapidly approach World War II levels.
Anyone who is not alarmed by the increase in US government debt
is living with his head in the sand.
Paul van Eeden
email: pve@publishers-mgmt.com
To subscribe to Paul van Eeden's
Commentaries please visit www.paulvaneeden.com
Disclaimer: This letter/article
is not intended to meet your specific individual investment needs
and it is not tailored to your personal financial situation. Nothing
contained herein constitutes, is intended, or deemed to be --
either implied or otherwise -- investment advice. This letter/article
reflects the personal views and opinions of Paul van Eeden and
that is all it purports to be. While the information herein is
believed to be accurate and reliable it is not guaranteed or implied
to be so. The information herein may not be complete or correct;
it is provided in good faith but without any legal responsibility
or obligation to provide future updates. Neither Paul van Eeden,
nor anyone else, accepts any responsibility, or assumes any liability,
whatsoever, for any direct, indirect or consequential loss arising
from the use of the information in this letter/article. The information
contained herein is subject to change without notice, may become
outdated and will not be updated. Paul van Eeden, entities that
he controls, family, friends, employees, associates, and others
may have positions in securities mentioned, or discussed, in this
letter/article. While every attempt is made to avoid conflicts
of interest, such conflicts do arise from time to time. Whenever
a conflict of interest arises, every attempt is made to resolve
such conflict in the best possible interest of all parties, but
you should not assume that your interest would be placed ahead
of anyone else's interest in the event of a conflict of interest.
No part of this letter/article may be reproduced, copied, emailed,
faxed, or distributed (in any form) without the express written
permission of Paul van Eeden. Everything contained herein is subject
to international copyright protection.
Paul van
Eeden Archives
Recent Gold/Silver/$$$ essays at 321gold:
Apr 11 Gold Stocks: Upside Breakouts Galore Morris Hubbartt 321gold Apr 08 A Pirate Ship Versus Gold Stewart Thomson 321gold Apr 04 Gold Stocks Strong As Stk Mkt Implodes Morris Hubbartt 321gold Apr 04 L@@K Amazon Kindle and Paperback Books by... Bob Moriarty 321gold Apr 04 Gold Stocks Defy Markets Adam Hamilton 321gold Apr 02 The Dogs of War are Howling for Gold Bob Moriarty 321gold
|
321gold Inc

|