Rubies are Red, Analysts will be Blue:Jonathan Toop Attending the Vancouver Cambridge House Investment Conference this January as a retired private investor, I was quite surprised to see that the biggest investment news in the days leading up to the conference seemed to receive absolutely no recognition. Most analysts who I talked to, and there were several, refused to look at, acknowledge, or in some cases even believe this incredible news. But the results were staring them in the face, backed up by individuals with professional credentials, specialized knowledge, and enthusiastic understanding that others would do well to heed. The analysts did not comprehend it, they ignored it, they ridiculed... it will you believe the news? The news that I am talking
about is 1937
grams a tonne, or 9685 carats a tonne, of gem grade
ruby and pink sapphire taken from a 30 tonne sample representative
of a 140m portion of what appears to be a multi-kilometer mineralized
trend in Greenland. An initial 0.24% of this gem grade material
was cut and appraised at up
to US $3220 a cut carat, adding an initial $770 a tonne of
value to final results that obviously will be much higher. The
company that found these rubies is True North Gems, TGX on the
TSX Venture Exchange.
Perhaps as a function of the myopia of some resource analysts, True North's share price is vastly discounted when compared to its closest cousins, diamond stocks. Note that the investment allure of diamond mining has largely derived from a few vast kimberlite pipes whose massive tonnage made up for typically miniscule diamond grades measured in carats per hundred tonnes. In spite of this, the most talked about diamond companies in Canada these days have pretty much given up on finding large, diamondiferous pipes, and are instead focused on dykes whose dimensions of a few meters width compare directly with True North's Aappalutoq ruby mineralization. These companies now face recovering massive tonnage at great cost in order to statistically predict mining economics in the low-grade world of diamonds that rarely surpass a carat a tonne or $100 a carat yields. And yet, they are the favorites of many analysts, generating much press. True North Gems, 9620 carats a tonne and all, stands virtually alone and seemingly ignored. I would challenge anyone to compare the higher market caps of such stocks as Hudson Resources and Shear Minerals with True North Gems and consider that their flagship properties have so far produced stones measured in milligrams as indications of their promise, whereas True North has produced 58 kilograms of valuable gem grade material from sampling of similar width mineralization extending from the surface. Rubies seem to induce a lower comfort level for investors and analysts than diamonds because they are a less known entity, but there is information on rubies waiting to reward those who are diligent enough to do their own research. True North Gems remains a low-hanging, unpicked fruit for investors, and the success that awaits owners of a 9620 carat a tonne ruby deposit may well make analysts who have made such statements as "I have absolutely no interest in looking at rubies" feeling blue in the years to come. REFERENCES (1) "Dealer Jack Abraham estimates rubies are 50 times rarer than diamonds but cost only a few times more for similar size and quality. In today's market, rubies appear to be a comparative bargain". Fred Ward. "Rubies and Sapphires", 2003 Gem Book Publishers. Bethesda, USA page 61 (2) On page 16 of the Jan/Feb 2007 edition of "The Guide - the Guide to Wholesale Gem Pricing"", published by Gemworld International's award-winning editor Richard Drucker, ruby availability and pricing is compared based on treatment. For stones of similar appearance and 2 carats weight, those filled with glass are said to be one million times more common than untreated stones, and command a theoretical value of $50 compared to $30,000. In between these extremes are stones that have undergone varying degrees of thermal enhancement (from 10 to 1650 times more common than similar looking untreated stones and valued from $3000 to $13000) and those with surface or lattice diffused colour (100,000 times more common than untreated stones, commanding values from $100-$500). True North has so far displayed rubies that are natural and unenhanced - the best having potential for very high prices, and others having potential to be attractive and saleable at lower prices after treatment. Jonathan Toop Disclaimer: Jonathan Toop is a retired Canadian private investor and a shareholder in True North Gems. He has not been paid by True North Gems to write this article, nor has True North in any way invited or encouraged this piece, which is an expression of opinion and not a recommendation to buy. Bob Moriarty, on the other hand, has walked on rubies in Greenland and has welcomed this opinion piece :-). Readers are recommended to do their own research, including reading my previous article on Greenland rubies, and any feedback, positive or negative, is highly welcome at jontoop@msn.com. |