Personal Bankruptcies SoarWhiskey & Gunpowder PERSONAL BANKRUPTCIES HAVE skyrocketed lately. Is anyone surprised? The primary reason is not Katrina or Rita as some might think, although I am sure hurricane floodwaters pushed quite a few over the edge. The real culprit is the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005. Following are some of the highlights of the bill: 1) Before anyone can file bankruptcy under the Bankruptcy Reform Act, he or she must receive a certificate from an approved nonprofit credit counseling agency that states that he or she has received a briefing on opportunities for available credit counseling and has been assisted in performing an individual budget analysis. The legislation mandates that the agencies offering the counseling be nonprofit in nature, such as the Consumer Credit Counseling Service of America (CCCS). But according to Jeffrey Morris, resident scholar at the American Bankruptcy Institute, the amount of time necessary to complete the counseling may take debtors away from work, which would put the struggling debtor even further behind. 2) A small but vitally important part of the 500-page bill is the six-page section dealing with a "means test." The "means test" is the system by which the IRS determines who can legitimately file for bankruptcy and who cannot. The test is a rigorous process involving examination of the debtor's income and expenses, calculations as to whether or not their expenses meet the standards of their area, and judgments relating to whether or not they genuinely qualify for a Chapter 7 filing. If the combined gross income of your family is greater than the median family income in your state, you may be required to file a Chapter 13 repayment plan where you repay a percentage of your debts over a 36-60 month period, and you are not allowed to file a traditional Chapter 7 bankruptcy where your debts are eliminated. The "means test" is an inflexible standard designed to leave no leeway for debtors to abuse the system, but in the process it is bound to penalize a great many people who have fallen into bad circumstances through no fault of their own. 3) If required to file a Chapter 13 under the means test, your monthly expenses will be compared with the IRS National and Local Standard Expense guidelines. The Bankruptcy Reform Act strictly limits the amounts you can claim as expenses. 4) Another provision of the bill places the burden of proof for bankruptcy on the debtor's lawyer, requiring the attorney's signature on the petition and verification that they have investigated the claim sufficiently and found it to be solid. Many lawyers will demand their fees up front, or they will decide the case isn't worth their time. Back in April I chimed, "Anyone currently on the edge will be best advised to file for bankruptcy BEFORE this bill takes effect in October. There is an incentive now, if at all in doubt, to file now and get it over with. I expect a dramatic increase in bankruptcies before this bill kicks in." Well Surprise, Surprise, Surprise. Here we are with bankruptcy filings soaring as the Oct. 17 deadline looms. The chart says it all: Thanks to The Washington Post for that chart. Let's tune in to what the article is saying:
The Charlotte Business Journal is singing verse two of the same song. Let's take a look:
Indeed. That last sentence says it all. It's also why I have a hard time feeling sorry for credit card companies -- with interest rates of 30% and fees for damn near everything -- weeping about not collecting every last penny from people they have no business lending to in the first place. Profits are at record levels but greed has been insatiable. Yes, some people have taken advantage of the system, but the bulk of filers have been those hit with huge medical bills, the loss of a job, or nasty divorce proceedings. Bush's "ownership society" striving to make second-class citizens out of renters has not helped, nor have teaser rates on loans. With the economy slowing there will be another rush of filings next year in the aftermath of Katrina and Rita and the bursting of the housing bubble. The idea behind the law is simple: to make debt slaves out of people forever. With that in mind, I have been thinking about ways the "means test" could backfire. Without knowing the legal specifics, it seems one way to pass the test is to make sure you have no job and no income when you file. I believe it's easy enough to get fired if you need to. Cap off the loss of a job with a six-month mandatory counseling period during which lots of expenses are racked up, and write-offs just might increase, not decrease as a result of the bill. I also think the law will backfire in another way. Anyone going through this process will think twice about unnecessary expenses and credit card purchases for a long, long time. That is a good thing, except of course for the greedy credit card companies thriving on usury and absurdly high fees. Bottom line: I think the credit industry slit its own throat with this bill, in more ways than one. Except for the additional suffering incurred by someone trapped with huge sudden medical expenses, that is just fine by me. Mike Shedlock "Mish"
Click here to subscribe.
|