please click banner to support our sponsor
Home   Links   Contact   Editorials

    Strangely Attracted to the Truth

Gold equities as options, a useful heuristic

Dave Lewis
August 11, 2004

I can't recall at which site I first came across the notion that gold mining equities, particularly the junior miners, were in a sense, call options on gold and if I could I would commend the author as I have since found the concept a useful heuristic. While first entertaining the notion, the "option-ness" if you will of the equities resided in the low p/e multiples of the sector. For but a few $s one could buy a call option on Gold that would only expire if the company went bankrupt. Of late, however, I've been extending this line of thought further as it seems to this old FX options trader that the junior miners are once again looking like very cheap call options.

When I was learning the trade of being an options speculator, thankfully with other people's money, the notion of implied volatility was somewhat difficult to grasp. I could see how it might relate to historic or measured volatility, and why it might rise in front of key data but not the longer term changes. One big piece of the puzzle was revealed to me when Britain fixed the pound within Europe's Exchange Rate Mechanism in 1990. I was managing the GBP/$ book at the time and working closely with manager of the GBP/DEM book. We had both positioned our books for an ERM entry both by being long volatility and long GBP but as we didn't know when the event would take place our exposure extended some 9 months out.  

On the day in question, Oct 8, 1990, Britain announced that the GBP would enter the ERM within a 6% currency fluctuation band. The GBP rose by some 5% against the US$ that week while the cross vs. the German Mark rose by 2.5%. Implied volatility, however, did not rise, instead, particularly on the cross, it fell quite significantly. The reason, which was so obvious in hindsight, but which eluded us in our prior speculations, was that once the GBP entered the ERM, the Central Banks would ensure that volatility would stay low. Implied volatility, particularly on the cross, stayed quite low for the next few quarters until it became apparent that the monetary authorities would not be able to defend the band. Readers in search of a more academic perspective of the events are invited to read this thesis on the subject.

This lesson from the past sprang to mind this weekend as I examined the relation of the HUI or unhedged gold mining equity index to the price of Gold. The graph below depicts this relation. As you can see, the ratio of the HUI to Gold, which can perhaps be thought of as the implied volatility of the synthetic option discussed above, has risen significantly over the past few years with the first jump coming when Gold broke over $300 and the second coming when Gold took out the old highs above $370 on its way to $400. More recently, the ratio has fallen as if the market now feels more comfortable that Gold will remain range bound. 

To the extent that prices for the sector continue to exhibit this option-like behavior, I would expect to see the HUI/Gold ratio rise again in the event that Gold breaks out above $430, or perhaps more accurately, when the market begins to fear that Gold will break out. Unfortunately, so long as the market believes that Gold will remain in a range, p/e multiples in the sector may continue to sink. Fortunately, in contrast to real options, time decay is not a factor so I will just have to be patient and wait to see if the yellow metal once again surprises the authorities. To the extent that a break to new highs in Gold is seen as a loss of Central Bank control, the rise of the HUI/Gold ratio might be quite substantial, something for which I am willing to wait. 

August 10, 2004
Dave Lewis
Chaos-onomics

321gold Inc