 Gold
Contra - Cyclical Opportunity?
Bob Hoye
Institutional Advisors
April 29, 2005
According to thorough technical analysis, the gold sector seems
to have reached a significant low. This is complete with measurable
signs of capitulation selling and rather bearish sentiment.
The latter shows up as extreme
lethargy in exploration stocks generally, despite good programs
and, until recently, some good gold rallies. This is opposite
to the condition in March-April, 2004.
Quite likely, the condition
offers much more than another trading opportunity out of an oversold
market.
As outlined below, on the very
long term the golds have set an important low in the Fall of
the year that a great financial bubble climaxed and then enjoyed
a cyclical bull market of 2 to 3 years as the big stock markets
suffered the initial post-bubble bear market.
At times, gold shares were
set back during the hard phases of the stock bear market, but
generally the golds gained as gold outperformed commodities.
The recovery out of the panic for stocks and low grade bonds
in late 2002 became a boom by mid-2003, with gold underperforming
commodities as well as silver.
Our gold/commodities index
declined from 255 in mid-2002 to 192 in March of this year. This
is not too far off the key cyclical low of 187 in the Fall of
2000. From 82 in June, 2003, the gold/silver ratio took a long
decline to 56.6 on December 1. Last week's low of 58.4 seems
to be testing both the December low and that of 57.2 on February
18.
The next step of this study
is to review the exploration side of the gold market, which offers
opportunity possibly beyond what one would expect from a normal
cyclical recovery in gold's price relative to commodities and
most asset classes.
Since the launch of the first
cyclical bull market in gold stocks in 4Q 2000, there has been
considerable activity by mining companies to expand gold producing
assets through acquisition rather than fieldwork. Yes, there
have been some discoveries but, in the meantime, it has been
a top-down process with the very big ones, such as Newmont merging
with Franco Nevada, right down to takeovers of companies with
only one mine.
Relative to this activity,
there has been little spent on exploration. A review of only
one company as an example can explain the diminished exploration
efforts and results. For decades until the early 1980s, Placer
Dome (it was then known as "Placer"), enjoyed the reputation
of having one of the great mine-finding teams and an outstanding
startup team.
In the early 1970s, the company
set up a forward planning committee that recommended an aggressive
expansion in gold over the hitherto exposure to base metals.
The timing and field results returned Placer to the ranks of
important gold producers.
The play in gold into 1Q 1980
was remarkable, as was the subsequent plunge in both precious
and base metal prices.
By that point, some of the
old top management had retired and the new guys showed an alarming
(at the time) dedication to short-term results as cash flows
diminished. The bean counters laid off the exploration geologists.
That essentially ended the
unique and ongoing culture it takes to find mines and start them
up. Occasionally since then, strong rallies in gold's nominal
price prompted Placer to suddenly acquire mine capacity, such
as in South Africa, in order to be "in the play."
The Cortez joint venture discovery has been the exception. (Placer's
chart is now in a pattern from which a significant rally could
follow.)
This one story generally reflects
the policies of some of the major companies and the big opportunity
pending is that the game of acquiring ounces has matured just
as gold is set to start another post-bubble cyclical bull market.
On this one, it will become
paramount to make many significant gold discoveries. Again, in
turning to generalities, the exploration talent and ambition
is not found solely in the big companies but in many small exploration
companies.
Every era of financial bubbles
is eventually followed by a severe credit contraction. Since
the advent of modern financial markets by around 1700, there
have been five examples prior to the blowout in 1Q 2000.
Mother Nature needs to fill
the post-bubble credit vacuum and, typically, gold's real price
has increased significantly and this resulted in equivalently
increased production and exploration success.
Also typically, the post-bubble
rise in gold ran for 20+ years and, in a number of examples,
a great gold rush occurred with gold's highest real price at
the end of the secular credit contraction. The discoveries in
the 1840s and late 1890s are the best known gold rushes - "California"
and the "Klondike." With varying degrees of
intensity and success, the record is complete back to the 1690s'
depression bottom, which recorded the "Oro Preto" mania
in Brazil.
Over the past year, the severe
decline in the U.S. dollar and associated rallies in gold haven't
been as profitable as the goldbugs were counting on. However,
as the more alert in the gold community are beginning to discover,
a bunch of currencies suddenly jumping relative to the U.S. dollar
doesn't translate to improving operating margins or soaring share
prices in Australia or Canada, for example.
For a real, rather than faux,
bull market, gold needs to be rising relative to alternative
assets such as stocks, bonds, and commodities. It also has to
be rising relative to most currencies.
When it comes to the decision
between intuitive and thorough research, these pages have always
trusted the latter. On the big sweep of time, financial history
is quite straightforward. While it didn't start in 1700, it is
an appropriate date to start this review. By the last quarter
of the 17th Century, there were enough publicly traded shares
to call it a stock market and the shaman of the financially superstitious
- the central bank of perpetual accommodation - had opened its
doors in 1694.
After rising for some 20+ years,
the "old" era of inflation blew out in 1720. This was
followed by a "new" era of inflation in financial assets.
Then, when this blew out in the ninth year after the mania in
tangible assets, a secular contraction followed.
Typically, this lasted for
some 20+ years as the bubbles in both tangible assets deflated.
Of course, the usual 3 to 4 year business and credit cycle prevailed,
so the process of credit contraction included some ups and downs.
Then from a secular low in
interest rates and commodity prices, a secular recovery followed.
The basic pattern recurs at the typical rate of twice per century.
Recently, there has been a
successful attempt to popularize the notion that from the lows
of late 2002 commodities have started a long bull market that
could run for about 18 years.
It must take considerable intellectual
audacity to promote intuitive research. The above part of this
brief review says it all. Yes, there are long bull markets for
commodities and they typically run for more than 20 years.
They start from a depression
bottom and end in the era of bubbles - never the other way around.
Throughout the period under
review, the behaviour of gold's real price, or purchasing power,
or mining profitability has been consistent. It has recorded
a significant low during the bubble era and then, once completed,
gold's real price increased for some 20+ years.
Some confusion in the goldbug
ranks can be reduced. Over the past 300 years, there have only
been two bull markets for gold in senior currency terms. The
first one ran for some nine years in the early 1800s and ended
when the great financial mania that blew out in 1825 got underway.
The only other example ran
for some nine years until 1980, from which collapse set up the
era of bubbles, during which gold would be likely to set a significant
low.
The following charts show two
things. One is that our commodity index seems to be replicating
the key top in the late 1980s.
The other - the gold/commodities
index - details the end of the tech bubble in 2000, which was
similar to gold's behaviour through the climax of the two previous
stock bubbles. When the U.S. was not on a gold standard,
gold's real price declined until that stock bubble blew out in
September, 1873. More specifically, it declined until November,
1873 when, with the reversal in the yield curve from flattening
to steepening, gold began its first cyclical recovery and the
economy suffered its first cyclical contraction within a secular
post-bubble contraction.
On the next bubble, the U.S.
was on a quasi-gold standard and it blew out in September, 1929.
Then gold's real price reversed to a cyclical recovery in November
along with the yield curve reversing from flattening to steepening.
Both the 1929 and the 1873
examples followed the pattern that was recorded with annual numbers
at the bubble tops of 1825, 1772, and 1720. Gold recorded a cyclical
decline with the mania and then, with the initial business contraction,
it enjoyed a cyclical recovery.
This recovery in stocks, business,
and credit markets is showing some of the classic signs of topping
at the same time as the gold side of the equation is indicating
downside capitulation.
In which case, the second cyclical
bull market whereby gold will outperform most commodities as
well as most financial assets is about to get underway. The first
one out of the collapse of the tech bubble launched a remarkable
drive to acquire millions of ounces of gold.
This one will launch an even
more remarkable drive to discover millions of ounces of gold.
Exploration companies with outstanding field abilities and portfolios
of identified properties will be outstanding performers. Think
about the small-cap tech stocks in 1994.
Bob Hoye
Institutional Advisors
E-mail bobhoye@institutionaladvisors.com
Website: www.institutionaladvisors.com
Hoye Archives
The opinions
in this report are solely those of the author. The information
herein was obtained from various sources; however we do not guarantee
its accuracy or completeness. This research report is prepared
for general circulation and is circulated for general information
only. It does not have regard to the specific investment objectives,
financial situation and the particular needs of any specific person
who may receive this report. Investors should seek financial advice
regarding the appropriateness of investing in any securities or
investment strategies discussed or recommended in this report
and should understand that statements regarding future prospects
may not be realized.
Investors should note that income from such
securities, if any, may fluctuate and that each security's price
or value may rise or fall. Accordingly, investors may receive
back less than originally invested. Past performance is not necessarily
a guide to future performance. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed constitutes
an offer to buy or sell any securities or options or futures contracts.
Foreign currency rates of exchange may adversely affect the value,
price or income of any security or related investment mentioned
in this report. In addition, investors in securities such as ADRs,
whose values are influenced by the currency of the underlying
security, effectively assume currency risk. Moreover, from time to time, members of the Institutional Advisors team may be long or short positions discussed in our publications.
321gold Inc
|
