It Just Never StopsKarl Denninger From Reuters this morning: [Tue.]
Of course. The banks were getting low on money to pay their bi-annual bribes, er, campaign contributions with. I always find it amusing when the solution to some crisis is more laws, when the existing laws are ignored.
Oh boy, here come the lawyers making threats! There's only one small problem - the widdle blogger was right!
Now this isn't particularly newsworthy. No, the newsworthy part is this:
Oops. Well, that explains the attempt to shut the widdle blogger up. Too bad it failed. Anyway, go to the link for the base article and read it. It's yet another one of those "fund of funds" deals, and it appears that it is the Veep's family that's somehow involved. What's even better is that they appear to be tangled up with Stanford Financial up to their nuts. This ought to be a lot of fun as it all unwinds, and you can bet I'll be keeping my ear to the ground. If you look outside the US you find actual reporters who report actual news. Like, for instance, this from The Times in the UK:
Oh oh - not in writing! You know, that nasty thing that happens when you use this old technology called "a pen" and it can be presented to this thing called "a jury"? When it comes to the pied pipers of the world, on this side of the pond, we have this piece of putrid tripe:
Uh huh. And who is this guy?
Oh, I see. An investment banking concern. Ok. Mr. Albertson is entitled to his opinion, of course, but I'd like to know what he bases that opinion on. Certainly it has to be more than the fact that banks reported "earnings" using various forms of accounting gimmickry, yes? Legal or not, things like shifting one's reporting period (as was done with Goldman) or pressing one-time gains from "advantageous" trading circumstances with crippled counterparties (e.g. AIG) is hardly an indication of soundness. Nor should one consider stealing $700 billion from the taxpayer and then posting a couple of billion in "profit" a good indication of soundness. After all, any monkey can lose 95% of the money stolen from everyday Americans and then report "great profits!" with the remaining 5%. Maybe Mr. Albertson can provide all of us with some actual analysis? How about putting market prices to all of these institution's holdings and showing me (and everyone else) that when this exercise is done the bank in question has a greater number for assets .vs. liabilities? Oh, and please do show your work; Dick Bove never does and yet he continues to pound the table that all is well even though if you hit the Cramer-style "buy-buy-buy" button last spring on his recommendation some of the banks involved (WaMu, Wachovia, etc) were either near or literal zeros, and essentially all of them have handed you a monstrous loss. See, I and others have been trying to get our arms around the asset valuation problem since I first started screaming about Washington Mutual (WaMu) back in April of 2007, more than two years ago. I still can't get to the facts but it's not for lack of trying. Rather, it is due to the lack of disclosure about exactly what's in the big bad black box, and that's an intentional act - by the banks. Unfortunately when I take what I believe are reasonable indications of current market values and apply them to what is claimed for the composition of these portfolios, given what is disclosed, I get a really big number for the balance between assets and liabilities. The problem is that it's in parenthesis. Apr 29, 2009 Karl Denninger's Market
Ticker All material herein Copyright ©2007-2011 Karl Denninger. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: The content of this article is provided without any warranty, expressed or implied. All opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and may contain errors or omissions. No material here constitutes "investment advice" nor is it a recommendation to buy or sell any financial instrument, including but not limited to stocks, options, bonds or futures. The author may have a position in any company or security mentioned herein. Actions you undertake as a consequence of any analysis or opinion in this article are your sole responsibility. Looking for "The Best of Market Ticker"? Check out Ticker Classics. |