Government
Spending Makes People Poorer
Bill Bonner
Provided as a courtesy of Agora Publishing
& The Daily Reckoning
Jan 28, 2010
Good news and bad news. But which is
which? The situation is so confused, we can't tell.
The good news is that housing prices
are going down. That's what The Wall Street Journal says.
"Home prices declined in November." Good. People will
be able to find more affordable housing.
Wait. That's not good news, is it? Doesn't
that mean we're still in a depression? Besides, another report
says housing is going up. What to believe?
Let's try something else... Consumer
confidence rose in the latest reporting period. No argument there...
Now, that's definitely good news, right?
Nope. The better things get the more likely the feds are to clamp
down on the recovery by "exiting" their stimulus efforts
and reducing the deficit. That's part of the reason stocks often
decline when the news is "good" and go up when it is
"bad." Investors are afraid the feds will take away
the juice. That would risk a return of the "error of '37,"...
say economists such as Paul Krugman and Richard Koo. Ignoring
the calendar a bit, it would turn our president into "Herbert
Hoover" Obama, as one commentator suggested.
What happened in the '30s? Well, in the
approved storyline, the feds had their stimulus foot to the floorboards...
and they were happily driving right out of the depression. But
fearing inflation, deficits, and a backlash against excessive
spending (and believing that they were clear of the bad neighborhood)
- they slowed down... they eased off their stimulus efforts in
the mid-'30s. This sent the economy into another downturn and
stretched the depression out for another 3 years.
It's nonsense. What really caused the
relapse of '37 was the feds' own meddling. But that's not the
way mainstream economists and analysts look at it. In their cockamamie
view, an economy grows thanks to the good stewardship of publicly
elected officials. In their view, government spending is actually
BETTER than private spending. Why? Because it produces nothing
of value. Really; we're not making this up. And so what if the
government doesn't have any money? To them, money that doesn't
exist - created 'out of thin air,' as Keynes put it - is BETTER
than real money. Because it creates consumer price inflation.
Up is down. Good is bad. Better is worse. In their view, what
makes a strong economy is government action. Specifically, government
spending. So, anything that might incline the feds to spend less
is BAD news.
According to the papers, there's some
bad news coming. 'Cause Mr. President is going to tell the nation
in his State of the Union address that it's time to put on the
brakes. If we don't, people will get the impression that government
spending is out of control. We can't have that. Because lenders
might refuse to lend. Investors might refuse to invest. Voters
might refuse to vote for the scalawags now in office.
On the other hand, if the Prez really
does cut spending, none of the aforementioned are likely to be
very happy about it. Federal spending doesn't really make people
richer; it makes them poorer. Still, appearances are what really
matter. Dim economists want a president who puts into action
their loopy theories. And dim voters want a president who takes
action to save them from their own mistakes... especially when
it means getting their hands on someone else's money.
The stimulus offered by government spending
is phony. But it appears real to the masses. Take it away and
the economic consequences will appear very real too. The 'creative
destruction' of the market will finally get to express itself.
Businesses that should fail will fail. Speculators who ought
to lose money will lose money. There will be blood, in other
words.
Like most people, we don't mind a little
blood, as long as it's not our own. So you can imagine how the
parasites will howl when they see the knife draw near to their
own arteries!
They can relax. The feds are not likely
to reduce spending significantly. The deficits are structural...
they're built-in to the system... they won't go away.
And as the depression lingers, the debt
piles up.
What will happen? We don't know. We can't
look into the future. But we can look at Japan, a country that
is at least 10 years ahead of us.
Why is Japan ten years ahead? Because
its stock market turned down in 1989... a decade ahead of Wall
Street. And because its population is about 10 years older. And
because it's been fighting the de-leveraging process for 20 years.
What can we learn? Here's the latest from the WSJ, warning
of an explosion:
"S&P lowers Japan's outlook
to negative."
Uh oh. Not too encouraging. The rating
agency told Japan that if it didn't cut its deficits its debts
would be downgraded.
Ah yes... Thanks to the Japanese, we
get to see someone cross the minefield ahead of us. After 20
years, Japan hasn't been able to get clear. But it hasn't blown
up completely, either.
But watch closely. It's putting its feet
down on some dangerous ground. Deficits have grown and grown
and grown. Now, it risks an explosion with every step. This year,
it will borrow $480 billion. It will receive only $405 billion
in tax revenue. As far as we know, no major economy has ever
run so far into the red without a blow-up.
And what can it do? They are getting
the same sort of advice as Obama. They're told they must cut
the deficit to protect the currency, the economy, and the credit
rating. But they're also told that good is bad, or bad is good...
that if they do the right thing - cutting the deficit - the economy
will suffer. Tax revenues will fall further, widening the deficit!
The Japanese economy has become so dependent
on debt-fueled government spending that, take it away and things
fall apart. In the long run, that is exactly what should happen.
The economy needs a shake-up so it can rebuild on more solid
foundations. But what politician wants to risk his own blood?
###
source: http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/government-spending-makes-people-poorer/2010/01/28/
Jan 28, 2010
Bill Bonner
email: DR@dailyreckoning.com
website: The
Daily Reckoning
Bill Bonner
is the founder and editor of The Daily Reckoning.
Bill's book,
Mobs,
Messiahs and Markets: Surviving the Public Spectacle in Finance and
Politics, is a must-read.
He is also the
author, with Addison Wiggin, of The Wall Street Journal best seller
Financial
Reckoning Day:
Surviving the Soft Depression of the 21st Century (John Wiley
& Sons).
In Bonner and
Wiggin's follow-up book, Empire
of Debt:
The Rise of an Epic Financial Crisis, they wield their sardonic
brand of humor to expose the nation for what it really is - an
empire built on delusions.
Copyright ©
2000-2013 Agora Financial LLC.
321gold Ltd
|