Benson's Economic
& Market Trends
Inflation & The Ironic
Productivity Tax
Richard Benson
Mar 29, 2007
Man is such a lucky creature
because machines do all of our work. Our economy and prosperity
stand on the shoulders of the geniuses who invented the wheel,
lever and plow, and the creative thinkers who dreamed up mathematics,
the internal combustion engine, silicone chip and the internet.
These innovations have led to wondrous and unforeseen leaps forward
for mankind. Human ingenuity, mixed with a desire to do better
and produce more with less, has relentlessly driven productivity
forward.
There was a time when I actually
looked forward to the government's reports on productivity because
it made me feel that I could share in the collective genius,
good luck, and hard work of my fellow man. Then I woke up and
realized that those very reports were being used to rob me! Here's
how I came to that conclusion.
The other day while at the
gas pump, I was thinking about productivity, creativity and technological
advances. When I realized how much it would cost me to fill up
my Sport Ute - an amount that would have fed a family of four
for a month when I was a kid - it dawned on me that the one thing
the government never reports on is that the dollar in my pocket
will buy me more next year. Indeed, my dollar should buy more
because of the relentless increases in productivity, and I should
in reality be better off if I saved money, rather than spent
it. But, in my lifetime, my world has only known inflation so
buying goods today that I will need tomorrow, and stashing then
away, has proved to be a better investment than saving cash in
the bank.
Even though my wallet was noticeably
lighter after paying the bill to fill up my car, I proceeded
to go to the supermarket. Regardless of all the gains in productivity,
everything on the supermarket shelves - and I mean everything
- was more expensive than the last time I shopped. A nagging
thought kept bothering me:
"If mankind's machines
produce more with less labor each year, why shouldn't the dollar
I make this year buy more next year?" Shouldn't this increase
in productivity flow through to the wage earner and saver?
This brings me to a serious
examination of inflation. Because I'm a trained economist, I
know that inflation is the Government's and Federal Reserve's
way of taxing financial assets like cash. I also realize inflation
is a horrible and insidious silent tax. I even encouraged my
wife to purchase inflation-indexed I-Bonds so she would at least
be able to keep up with inflation. But perhaps those I-bonds
haven't kept up with what I see as real inflation, which
is not the same inflation measured by the government.
So, anyway, back to the supermarket.
Here I was rolling the cart up and down the aisles stunned at
the cost of simple groceries. We're not even talking about the
price of meat - pushed up by the price of cattle, hogs and chickens,
which has been pushed up by the price of corn. Corn has been
pushed up because some Washington politicians think that turning
all corn into ethanol for use in cars is popular, but I view
this as incredibly stupid, unless, of course, you like higher
food prices. As a consumer, when I think about the escalating
cost of food today, I realize I really didn't benefit at all
from all those productivity gains! Meanwhile, with inflation,
the government has basically stolen/taxed my share of productivity
away. Stunning and painful thought!
Shopping was so stressful that
I needed to go home to rest. Just as I'm drifting off, reality
hits me like a ton of bricks between the eyes. I have been writing
for years about how the government has been using "hedonic"
price adjustments to hold down reported inflation and one way
inflation measures are modified over time is in the way in which
goods from the present are compared with goods from the past.
Let's use the purchase of your computer as an example:
The concept behind a hedonic
adjustment is that because your computer is twice as fast and
stores twice as much data for the same price, the price you paid
is cut in half. The actual price you paid for the computer is
not cut in half, but the price as reported in the price indexes
is!
Well surprise, surprise! Most
of what passes for hedonic adjustments in the price indexes is
simply another way of reporting the improvements in technology.
Another name for this is, of course, "productivity".
Technological advances, hedonics, and productivity are all names
and measures for the same fundamental fact: technological advance
allows for the increase in productivity that is translated into
the hedonic adjustments.
Something didn't feel right.
I got up and examined the shrinking dollar in my wallet and I
felt like I was robbed! First, by the Federal Reserve Bank because
they have keep inflation moving ahead so I never receive the
benefit of productivity, and then by the slick Bureau of Labor
Statistics, ("BLS") that actually made the Price Index
pay for productivity by subtracting it from the CPI and reporting
it as a smaller number than it really is! (It's ironic
that the best and brightest at the BLS are employed to figure
out how to use fancy statistics to rob their grandparents of
their social security increases.)
If our government was fair
and money and credit growth were restrained, I estimate the dollar
could purchase about two percent more each year, and we would
be living in a saver's paradise. Taking productivity out of the
Price Index means that when the CPI shows three percent, in reality
it's more like five percent. Our government gains by doing this
because as the world's largest borrower, they benefit from increases
in productivity. On the other hand, savers and those on fixed
income really get ripped off. In a $14 trillion economy, the
two percent productivity rip-off is likely to amount to a cool
$280 billion, and the total inflation tax on five percent is
over a half trillion dollars. That is enough tax revenue to pay
for a not so little war!
I'm working and making a great
living so why should I, of all people, complain because the inflation
tax is cruel and pushed higher because of productivity being
perversely subtracted from inflation? Well, I'm getting older,
too, and my heart goes out to the retired couple next door on
fixed income, knowing full well that their cost of living is
adjusted down because of productivity. If there was no increase
in productivity, the government would have to pay the retired
couple more since the hedonic adjustment, reducing inflation,
would be zero. If the hedonic adjustment was zero along with
zero productivity, that same retired couple might be able to
stay even with the real cost of living! For people on fixed income,
technological advance - leading to increased productivity - is
a curse rather than a blessing.
So, when looking forward, it
is important to remember that whenever productivity slows down
inflation will suddenly pick up, because there is no hedonic
adjustment (productivity) to subtract from the real number.
Now that I clearly understand
how this productivity tax works, I am less inclined to buy inflation-indexed
bonds and more inclined to buy gold and sliver. I believe precious
metals are more likely to track the real inflation numbers. The
government's phony numbers are used to hide and pretend that
the inflation tax is much lower than it really is. Given the
size of our country's deficits, and the size of unfunded entitlements,
the U.S. government is insolvent. The U.S. is inflating like
crazy, and it's only going to get worse.
Every trick in the book will
be used to make sure that the masses continue holding the government's
paper money that promises to always buy less, and less, and less.
Sticking in a productivity tax through hedonic adjustment is
a cute trick, but as a saver or investor you shouldn't fall for
it!
Richard Benson
Archives
President
Specialty
Finance Group, LLC
Member FINRA/SIPC
2505 S. Ocean Boulevard
- Suite 212
Palm Beach, Florida 33480
1 800-860-2907
email: rbenson@sfgroup.org
Richard Benson, SFGroup, is a widely-published
author on securitization and specialty finance, and a sought after
speaker at financing conferences on raising equity for mid-market
companies.
Prior to founding
the Specialty Finance Group in 1989, Mr. Benson acted as a trading
desk economist for Chase Manhattan Bank in the early 1980's and
started in the securitization business in 1983 at Bear Stearns,
and helped build the early securitization businesses at Citibank
and E.F. Hutton.
Mr. Benson graduated
from the University of Wisconsin in 1970 in the Honors Program
in Math, and did his doctoral work in Economics at Harvard University.
Mr. Benson is a member of the Harvard Club of New York and Palm
Beach.
The Specialty
Finance Group, LLC is a Florida Limited Liability Company and
is registered with FINRA/SIPC as a Broker/Dealer.
321gold Ltd
|